The Effectiveness of Manual Control During Simulation of Flight Tasks (Pilot)

Objectives

This experiment explored the long-term effects of microgravity on crewmembers' physical and mental coordination in space. Before the flight, the test subjects were trained to perform certain computer tasks. During the flight, the subjects were to perform the same tasks, and their work quality and skill retention would be measured and compared to data taken before the flight. Researchers expected that the subjects would take longer to perform tasks in space, and would have more errors during performance of these tasks. The expriment also compared training performance and subjects' physical and mental states with actual inflight performance and states. Results of this research would be used to develop countermeasures for increasing crewmember efficiency on future space missions.

Shuttle-Mir Missions
Mir-18

Approach
The experiment used a ground-based Russian spacecraft control simulator and a Mir-based workstation system to simulate re-docking of a Soyuz module to the Mir station. Both the simulator and workstation contained a video monitor, simulation control joysticks and medical monitoring equipment called "Gamma-1." The two systems were telemetrically connected in a closed loop system, with the ground-based unit transmitting simulated vehicle states to the test subject at the Mir workstation. The workstation, in turn, transmitted test subject actions and physiological information to the ground-based simulator. Audio and video systems uploaded and displayed the ground-based simulator version of the orbital station Mir to the two test subjects. Following the simulation, crewmembers provided a self-report on his/her functional state and performance.

The experiment collected data before, during and after the mission. Preflight data collection was scheduled during training exercises on the "Podvieska" computer simulator at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Russia. Gamma-1 medical monitoring sensors were applied to the body to detect heart rate, cranial blood flow and blood pressure. The data collection sessions established a baseline for individual levels of work performance and skill retention.

The same work tasks were to be performed during flight while each subject was positioned at the Mir workstation. Heart rate, cranial blood flow and blood pressure were to be measured using the same medical equipment as preflight. At the completion of each data collection session, the subject was to complete a self-report describing his skill retention and work performance. All data was to be transferred from the Mir to the Shuttle (STS-71) for return to Earth.

After flight, two additional simulator sessions were to be performed using the same equipment as the preflight data collection sessions. The investigators debriefed two subjects in a verbal question-and-answer session followed by the subjects' completion of a questionaire. This provided a self-evaluation of the difficulty and quality of task performance.

Results
The PILOT experiment was not performed successfully in flight due to hardware and logistical problems. Experiment hardware used during ground-based training was considerably different from that used in flight and the control strategies for using the flight hardware differed from those of the ground hardware. Also, the procedures used in conducting the experiment preflight differed from inflight procedures.

Data was collected preflight in Russia from both subjects but the results were not reported to the US investigator. Not all data collection sessions were performed as scheduled. Partial inflight data was collected for one subject, but the data was incomplete for those sessions. Postflight data was not collected for either subject.

Given the incompleteness of the data collected and the anomalies with ground and flight hardware and the preflight and inflight procedures used, researchers were unable to perform data analysis. No valid conclusions or findings were possible.

Publications
None available at this time.

Principal Investigators
Deborah L. Harm, Ph.D.
NASA/Johnson Space Center

V. P. Salnitskiy, Ph.D.
Institute of Biomedical Problems

Text only version available

This page is best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher or Netscape 4.0 or higher.
Other viewing suggestions.

NASA Web Policy

NASA
Curator: Julie Oliveaux
Responsible NASA Official: John Uri

Page last updated: 07/16/1999

PSINet logo