NASA Johnson
Space Center Oral History Project
Edited Oral History Transcript
J. Milton
Helfin
Mission Control Center Tour
Houston, Texas – 3 June 2003
Heflin:
I am from Oklahoma. I grew up in a very small town in northern Oklahoma,
Osage County, town of about two thousand. The thing that I really
liked about that place was it was a town full of houses that had front
porches. I wish I could live in a house today that had a front porch.
Welcome to what I will refer to as the cathedral of human spaceflight
operations. [Heflin is in the Apollo Mission Operations Control Room.]
That’s how I like to characterize this place. Every time I come
in here, I can hardly hear you breathing. See how quiet it is? It’s
a very quiet place. Of course, we no longer use the facility here,
but when I come into this room, I’m absorbed by all the history
that has occurred in this room, and we’ll talk about some of
that. I used the word “history.” Let me tell you and share
with you that I really admire what you all are doing. NASA has done
a very poor job, myself included, at capturing a lot of our background
and a lot of our history. By the way, my thirty-seventh anniversary
is this Friday, June the sixth. I can remember when I came to work
here because it was 6/6/66 when I started here.
I look back upon the time I’ve spent here, and when I get a
chance to talk to new employees, I tell them they ought to do something
that I didn’t do. That is, you should keep a journal. My problem
every time I tried to keep a journal was I tried to write too much
in it, instead of just a little phrase, a word, a person’s name,
a topic, because I found out that’s all that’s required.
If you can just get those things down, then I think years later you
can look back and say, “Yes, I remember that.” I had the
privilege of being part of this program and was interviewed some time
ago, based on my [landing] and recovery [background] back in the Apollo
days when we used to land spacecraft in the water. I went into that
somewhat terrified because I felt like I really wouldn’t remember
a lot, but the folks, like you, who do these interviews, you know
how to get people to remember certain things, because there’s
things you can ask. That’s what occurred, so I think it was
able to kind of help dredge some of that out of my memory. I really
do respect a great deal what you’re doing. You’re capturing
a lot of the sort of things that need to be done. It’s just
sad that we’ve waited so long for this a program to come along
and to grab all this. So appreciate your working in that arena. So
here you are in the cathedral of human spaceflight operations. Think
of where you were. Some of things I’ll probably tell you, you
already know. Think of where you were in June of 1965. Some of you’ve
already learned in the history process, that was the first time we
used this facility to control one of this country’s human spaceflights
by ourselves. We had worked this room in conjunction with Cape Canaveral
[Florida] and that control room prior to standing on our own, back
in June of 1965. That was done with the second two-man Gemini flight.
Up until that time, as you probably are very aware, we used to control
all these flights from Cape Canaveral. Go back to the Mercury days,
and our control centers were actually sprinkled around the world.
We didn’t have the satellites in high Earth orbit to be able
to allow for a worldwide communication, so every time we came across
some island or some area, Australia, with a tracking station, we would
have an astronaut, some senior systems people there, to act as a mini
Mission Control Center during that communication pass. Changed a great
deal, of course, today. … If you look over on your right-hand
side, you’ll see a rectangular mission patch. It’s an
American flag. It’s Gemini IV. I love the way NASA does things.
It’s Gemini IV, but it was the second manned Gemini flight.
Of course, we flew unmanned vehicles as well. Gemini IV—that
was the first flight we controlled out of here, so all of these mission
plaques up on the wall over here on your right-hand side represent
the missions that actually flew out of this room. You see all the
Gemini flights that we controlled from here, all through the Gemini
Program.
Hard to see for some of you, but the very last plaque on the bottom
row far right is Apollo 7. That’s the first manned Apollo flight
that we flew from this room that you’re in. I say, “room
that you’re in.” We had a room like this downstairs, looked
just like this. That was back in the days you’d fly a flight
out of one room, and it would take months to really configure the
next room for the next flight, because we operated huge mainframe
computers. It took a lot of work to get the computers set up to control
the next flight. So you’d be configuring a room prior, and then
use the one that’s like this one at that time. We also envisioned
controlling two spacecraft at one time, which we did in the Gemini
Program. We had two of them aloft at the same time, so we had control
rooms operating them both. So Apollo 7, first manned Apollo, and then
up in the top right-hand corner over here, the triangular mission
patch, the figure 8, is Apollo 8. That’s significant, very significant,
I think, [for] a couple of reasons, one very personal, and then one
from a global standpoint. Of course, that was the flight where we
went to the Moon, probably the gutsiest thing this country ever did
from a human spaceflight standpoint. That wasn’t my original
thought at all. That comes from people like [Dr. Robert R.] Gilruth
and [Dr. Christopher C.] Kraft and George [M.] Low and those who came
before me. It was the gutsiest thing I think we’ve ever done
because if you stop and think about it, we left the Earth, we left
Mother Earth to go to the Moon, and the second time we put human beings
into a spacecraft, into the Apollo spacecraft. It’s pretty gutsy.
Not sure we could do that today.
That’s
a very significant mission and personally very significant for me,
because I was a member of the landing and recovery operation back
then, and this was the first time that I served as a NASA advisor
onboard an aircraft carrier out in the Pacific for the recovery operation.
It was on the USS Yorktown in the Pacific for the splashdown of Apollo
8 in December of 1968, and so it’s a very, very special time
for me. I ended up on eight primary recovery ships as a NASA advisor
to the Navy and to the deployed forces. We were a division of about
a hundred and twenty some odd people, counting military people, civil
service contractors back in the late sixties. By the time we did our
last water landing, we were down to a group of about ten people, and
I was one of the ten people. So what I did for the end of the splashdown
era, which occurred with the Apollo-Soyuz [Test Project] mission in
1975, I served as a NASA advisor to the deck force on the aircraft
carrier responsible for the rigging, for how you come alongside and
pick the command module up. I also interfaced with the underwater
demolition teams, the swim team—this was the USS New Orleans,
a helicopter carrier.
So
I was their NASA advisor to them. Also, we had an embarked helo [helicopter]
squadron out of San Diego [California] that was on board that USS
New Orleans, and I was the NASA advisor to them. The helicopter squadron,
the underwater demolition team swimmers, and the deck force were my
responsibility for the very last water recovery. I’ll tell you
what. If you ever get in trouble anywhere, you need to be around a
bunch of underwater demolition team swimmers or SEALS [Sea, Air, Land],
Navy SEALS, as you probably have heard them referred to at times,
even though they’re a little bit different. These are young
men that if you get in any trouble, they can get you out of any kind
of trouble, great bunch of young men. That’s my recovery story.
So you go on across the wall there, and you see Apollo 8, Apollo 9,
Apollo 10, of course, and then you see the eagle. “The Eagle
has landed.” Apollo 11 was controlled out of this room. And
right here at the flight director console, Gene [Eugene F.] Kranz,
flight director, gave the go to Charlie [Charles M.] Duke, the astronaut
who voiced up to the crew, “You’re go to land.”
Very recently, we had a request, a media request, for release of a
combination of the air-to-ground voice and flight director loop voice,
about forty minutes before landing on the Moon through landing of
about ten or fifteen minutes. I was asked to review that before it
was released. I’m not sure why. Quite frankly, a lot of it has
been released. Nonetheless, I got sent over a CD [Compact Disc] to
listen to that. Of course, I’ve heard it before, but I hadn’t
heard it in quite a while. This happened about a month ago or so,
so it was real interesting to sit there and listen to the conversations
that went on in this room. It’s interesting, because as I listened
to it, there were a lot more communication problems that occurred
between the command service module and the lunar module after they
separated and were on the backside of the Moon and coming around for
acquisition.
There
were a lot more communication problems, and it sounded like a really
hairy time for the people here. Close to landing the computer systems
on board the lunar module were overloaded and still operating but
created great pause and they were getting close to losing fuel when
they landed as well, but it was really something to listen to again.
I really enjoyed that a great deal. Apollo 13, same Gene Kranz. Now,
okay, how many of you have read his book? Have any of you read his
book? Okay, that’s good. Have any of you read Chris Kraft’s
book? By the way, that’s my favorite book. I think Chris Kraft’s
book titled Flight: My Life in Mission Control, I think is
the really the better of the two because of the history that Dr. Kraft
goes into. Anybody read the book [Apollo] EECOM [Electrical, Environmental
and Communications]: [Journey of a Lifetime] yet? Sy [Seymour] Liebergot,
who was the EECOM here in Mission Control during Apollo 13 has just
recently come out with a book. I’ve thumbed through it. I haven’t
read the thing yet, but I’ve thumbed through it. It’s
a good, good book. So Apollo 13 was controlled out of this room as
well, and Gene Kranz was obviously a key flight director that worked
that flight as well. While I’m talking about Apollo 13, let
me direct your attention over here to this wall. [Points] Right there,
there is you see a mirror that’s framed. It’s a framed
mirror there by itself. When you’re in a spacecraft and you’re
strapped down and it’s hard to move around or whatever, we use
mirrors. You have a mirror so that you can look up here and see something
behind you like a switch panel back here to get to. Aircraft uses
the same thing.
So
that mirror is very special. It flew on lunar module 7, call sign
Aquarius, which was the lifeboat for Apollo 13. It allowed the crew
to survive and get back here to Earth. The flight crew elected to
present that mirror to the folks here in Mission Control. So it basically
says, “Presented by a grateful Apollo 13 crew to the men and
women, so they can see who got them back safely,” which I think
is a very special thing here in the room. While we’re talking
about that side, you see all these mission plaques on your left-hand
side, those all represent the flights that were controlled from the
room I talked about that’s downstairs just like this. We may
stick our head [in] or walk through that room to show you what it
looks like today, because it’s been changed a great deal into
what we call the science center. So when we reconfigured that room,
we elected to bring all those mission plaques up here.
You
see a lot of framed documents there. Those represent a flight director
who is no longer a flight director, has retired. Every flight director
has a call sign that they can use for the name of their team, and
back in the early days, they used colors. The very first flight director
was Chris Kraft, and he was known as Red Flight. Gene Kranz was White
Flight. So when a flight director retires and they are worthy enough,
which we haven’t found one that hasn’t been yet, then
we retire their color or their call sign, and that proclamation states
that for those number of flight directors. Now I have a challenge
as Chief of the Flight Director Office today and I can’t take
total blame, but we are woefully behind on the number of retired flight
directors we need to honor. I’m trying to consider a way to
get that done here within the next year if I possibly can. I want
to take advantage of people like Chris Kraft, Gene Kranz, while they’re
still here, to be present when we do that sort of thing. That represents
at least a handful of flight directors that have retired, and, by
the way, the flight director roll is up to fifty-six to date, from
Chris Kraft up to fifty-six. In 2000, my office had to hire ten more
flight directors because of the twenty-four seven operation we’re
doing with Space Station. I’ve got twenty-six flight directors
in the office today.
When I came in the office in 1983, I think there were six of us that
came in, and there were like six or so in the office at the time.
So it’s grown a great deal, more than doubled in size since
that time due to the twenty-four seven operation. By the way, as a
manager, a flight director is a type A individual. Actually, they’re
type double A. Some of them are type triple A individuals. So you
can imagine the damage control I’ve got to do sometimes when
I’ve got that many type A individuals in an office. Although,
I will say one thing, though, I don’t have to motivate these
people at all. If anything, I’ve got to slow them down sometimes.
So we were talking Apollo 13. We were talking these plaques over here.
Another very subtle thing here in the room that I really want to point
out to you, if you look down here towards the water fountain, you’ll
see the Apollo 1 patch, representing the crew that perished on the
launch pad in January of 1967. By the way, don’t you find it,
it’s strange? It’s bizarre. It’s troublesome. If
you look at our loss of human life in this business, it all occurred
that same week. I mean February 1st [loss of Columbia, STS-107] is
close enough in my opinion, but if you look at the Apollo fire and
Challenger [STS-51L] and it’s all the last week in January.
So that represents that crew. I was an employee of seven months when
that occurred. Right next to that is the Challenger plaque. Those
two plaques are there for a special reason. The tradition we have
here in Mission Control is we like to honor one of the flight control
positions in Mission Control or somebody in the engineering staff,
somebody we believe that went a little bit above and beyond the call
of duty to make the mission a success. What we do is we honor them
by having them hang the mission plaque in Mission Control after a
mission. We bring in an extension ladder and get the team in here,
and they crawl up this ladder, probably one of the most hazardous
things we do, and hang the mission plaque.
Until a mission plaque is hung, it resides at a console called GC.
GC stands for ground control. The ground control flight controller
here is the one responsible for basically the building infrastructure.
They’re the one responsible to see that this facility is up
and running and supplying all the data to the flight controllers.
They also interface with the worldwide network to be sure all the
telemetry, voice, television from around the world gets into this
building. The mission plaque resides at the GC console. It usually
just sits on the floor someplace, and it stays there until it’s
time to pass that mission plaque off to the flight director, who will
then present it to the person to hang the plaque. So the tradition
is, is that it resides at the GC console. This used to be the GC console
down here in this room on this corner. So that’s why those two
plaques are hanging right there, because the missions weren’t
completed. They’re at the GC console. They’re on the wall.
Sadly to say, when we get down into the white flight control room,
the white FCR, the Shuttle flight control room, you will see the Columbia
plaque, which now hangs by the GC console down there in that room.
Let’s see. You would appreciate the fact that we’re now
getting to the point where we’ve got some kids that come into
this room now, and I can’t tell you what age it is for sure,
but there are kids now showing up that no longer know what this is
right here. [Points] This is a dial phone for those of that you can’t
see it. [Heflin dials the phone.] It’s a dial telephone. I mean
really, we’ve got kids now showing up that really don’t
know what this is. It just dawned on me recently [in the] last year
or two that that was happening. One of my favorite topics in here
is to talk about this. If any of you have any money that you can deposit
these days in a bank, you’ve done this, you’ve used one
of these things. [Heflin shows a P-Tube.] It’s called the P-tube.
“P” for pneumatic. Why in the world P? I don’t know.
Why didn’t pneumatic start with an N? Bobby [Wright], does that
bother you? It used to bother me, by the way. This is the way we would
pass hard copy around from this room to supporting rooms.
Everybody
that sits in here is a flight controller, except for the flight director.
The flight controllers have people that support them in other rooms
outside of this room, so they would exchange hard copy. Also, when
you took a picture, basically, of your display here, it showed up
in one place downstairs. That operator down there would have to take
that copy that you got of your display, look at a number on that,
and then know to put it in this P-tube and send it to a certain station,
so you’d get a hard copy of your display. For those of you that
can see it, the P-tube station has a little panel where you could
select a station you wanted to send to. You would select it. By the
way, flight controllers got—in fact, I used to do this. I’ve
worked in this room. There was a way I could kind of sit back here,
took some skill, but after a while, you learned how to do it. You
could sit here, and you’d just go like that with this thing.
[Gestures] You could hit the right little button. If you look at these
panels, they’re pretty. They got a lot of little buttons on
them. You could hit the right button, and then you do it with some
kind of flare, you see. People in this room were showmanship kind
of people. These are the glory hogs that used to sit out here in this
room. All the people that did the real hard work sat in the back rooms,
but the glory hogs all sat out here, by the way. So you know you could
sit back, hit that [demonstrates], this little lid would pop up. You
take this and drop it inside there, and away it goes. Of course, those
of you who are fortunate enough to deposit money in a bank with these
things, you’ve heard the sucking sound that would occur. These
things would get sucked away, and when they arrived down below here
was a little station down below. And as they’d arrive, they’d
sound like this [demonstrates] as they came in. By the way, there’s
a little lever down here. [Points] They thought, “We ought to
be sure and let people know these things are here, so they’ll
see them.” So they had a little lever that this thing would
go up against that would ring a little bell and also a little light
would go on so they would know that they had something that they had
to get out of the P-tube container. It didn’t take people very
long before they decided we don’t need that darn bell, so they
went ahead and disabled the bell.
[If] this wasn’t recorded, I’d probably say something
else. So the reason I talk about this is this ended up being the ambiance,
the heartbeat of this room. You’d walk in here. There’d
be muffled voices, people talking, but the goings and comings of the
P-tube was kind of the heartbeat of this room. I’m probably
one of the few people that really talk about this. I notice things
like this. When we built our new control center, which we’re
going to go into here after this, we no longer use the P-tube system.
So the ambiance, the heartbeat of the room today, [it’s] still
got muffled voices, but you could stand in the middle of the room
and just listen. You don’t hear P-tubes coming and going, [instead]
you hear the clicking of keyboards. That’s what you hear. You
look around, and you see flight controllers and their heads. They’re
all clicking the keyboards. I had fun with this the first time we
opened up the new control room.
By
the way, as a flight director, I worked on this side and never did
work as a flight director in the new room. I have fun telling people
when I’m asked, and I get asked, “Well, golly, you know,
you used to really enjoy this job. I mean, you liked being a flight
director, and you were good at it. Why aren’t you doing it today?”
I said, “Well, let me put it to you this way. Can you envision
Gene Kranz at a console clicking a mouse?” [Laughter] That’s
my feeling, too, you know. I don’t want to have to. If I was
in that control room working today, I’d have to have a little
pedestal with this mouse, because I don’t like to sit down.
When I operated in here, I was usually up on my feet all the time,
walking around. I just couldn’t see a flight director messing
around with a mouse. You’ll see that when we go downstairs,
and I’ve gotten over that. I tell people that’s why I
finally got out of that business. So the room has changed, and it’s
a flat floor as well compared to this.
Let me talk about some of this up here instead of downstairs. Of course,
you see the big displays up here. [Points] You’ll see them downstairs
as well. They’re really there to provide what we figure to be
situational awareness information for the entire team. Each flight
controller who specializes in a technical discipline will have individual
data appear on their discipline to look at or whatever. But there
are certain things we want all flight controllers to see at one time.
We would put those on these displays up here in front, called situational
awareness displays. For those of you that read Chris Kraft’s
book, you may or may not remember it. I got a big kick out of it when
I read it. Early in the book, he was here when Philco-Ford [Corporation]
came in to develop this room and build the very first control center.
It was down at the Cape, by the way, not here, when he was first involved.
As they were building the control center, the contractor came in.
One day when Chris showed up in the control room, they had a big display
up in front that had a world map on it, kind of a crude thing. They
had a world map, a ground track, and they had a way to track the position
of the spacecraft on that orbit, probably manually, as it went around
the world. Kraft saw that and just chewed them upside down and the
other. He thought that was the biggest waste of money. Why in the
world did they do that? We don’t need that. He said this in
one paragraph in his book. The next paragraph, he says, “How
wrong I was.” Because he learned he could use that display in
a situational awareness position that told him immediately where we
were and how much time he had as a flight director and they had as
a team to say something to the crew. On the world map, we had a little
circle that shows you. If you’re inside that circle, you’re
above the horizon at that tracking station. You can communicate with
the tracking station. You’re inside that circle. Sometimes we
cross that circle right in the middle. When you do that, you may have
five minutes to talk to them. We may cross that circle at the edge
of the circle, and you’ll see this in the Station flight control
room, [we] might cross the edge of the circle. “Uh-oh, I’ve
only got a minute or less.” That’s what it did for him
as a member of the team.
He was able to see that and immediately notice that, “Hey, I’ve
only got a minute to talk to the crew. I don’t have five minutes,”
so he didn’t have to think, didn’t have to take a clock,
and do any math to decide how much time that he had. So that world
map display became extremely useful from a situational standpoint.
People come in the room and think, “Well, it’s really
a public affairs sort of thing,” but it is an extremely useful
tool. It still is today. Let’s see here. Everybody’s still
awake. Do you have any questions about this room? Now, I think we’re
planning to go down to the Shuttle flight control room, and we’ll
probably try to stick our head in. There’s a large number of
you, but I’ll decide when I get done. We might stick our head
into the Space Station flight control room before we leave today to
let you. At least you’ll see it. You may not be inside of it,
but at least you’ll see it. Do you have any questions about
the cathedral of human spaceflight operations, of which you’re
in?
Borowski:
Can you go over briefly, one sentence, maybe two, what each station
was and what it controlled?
Heflin:
I can do it in probably a dozen sentences or so. Is that okay to?
It’s probably a good place to talk about it, since [once] we
get downstairs, there will be people in the room we’re going
to go into. It might be harder to talk about. Flight director is like
an orchestra leader. Just think of the flight director as an orchestra
leader. Flight director really doesn’t need to know how to play
trombone, although I do. But an orchestra leader needs to know when
the trombone is going to come in. Then you’ve got musicians,
technical discipline experts in the flight control room. Back in the
Mercury days, it was new. You needed all the eyes. Everybody you could
get looking at the stuff was going to help you from a safety standpoint
and mission success standpoint. Now think about it. A spacecraft [is
a] complicated system, so let’s put people on the ground that
can do the worrying for the astronaut in the capsule, as we used to
call them. So the concept came to be. “Okay, then let’s
break this up by discipline. Let’s have somebody who’s
smart in propulsion. Let’s have somebody who’s smart in
electrical power generation, somebody smart in guidance navigation
and control.” Basically broke up the room into technical disciplines,
and they specialized in those technical disciplines. We still do that
today. Even with Space Shuttle, you have a finite amount of time you
can be on orbit, two to three weeks maximum time you could be on orbit.
It’s expensive to get there, and the more time that the astronauts
onboard can devote their duties to doing any kind of observations,
scientific work, or whatever, then the better off we’ll be and
the most bang for our buck that we’ll get. And so we still have
people on the ground that do this.
So
this is broken up into the captain of a ship. In fact, I’ll
tell you what we’ll do. We’ll get downstairs. The consoles
actually have the names on the console, and I’ll talk a little
bit about the technical discipline down there. They are broken up
into several. Space Station is much different. I shouldn’t tell
you this story. The Space Station is really a challenge today, because
we’re twenty-four seven, and we’re trying to find the
right kind of way to operate this because you can’t have flight
controllers sitting around looking at digital data all the time, even
though we have teams that come and rotate, [they work] eight, nine-hour
shifts. We’re getting smarter. We’re getting to where
on weekends we stand down to fewer flight controllers. Overnight we’ll
do the same thing, and we’re trying to do that. The concept
of having people here when time is critical, like during launch and
during entry, during rendezvous and docking, during spacewalks, those
times that are very, very time critical operations, having people
in here to be able to watch over their shoulders is the reason why
I think we’ve been so successful. I look back upon the things
that have occurred to us, where we’ve lost people, there’s
been four times. There’ve been four times in the history of
this country’s human spaceflight program that were really, really
life-threatening. Only one time did the flight control team have an
opportunity at the time of the event to do anything about it. That
was Apollo 13, and we were lucky on Apollo 13 that the explosion did
what it did and didn’t do anything worse. Challenger and Columbia,
at the time of the event, there wasn’t anything that we could
do. Any questions before we leave this room?
Wright:
Can you talk a little bit about the training that’s done in
here as well.
Heflin:
The hardest part of this job is not being here during an actual spaceflight.
That’s not the hardest part of our job. The hardest part of
our job is getting ready to come in here to support one of these missions.
We do train as much as a year and a year and a half out. It depends
on the mission. We start training an integrated team leading into
a flight. Within the last two or three months, we’ll bring flight
controllers in here and we’ll run through a simulation. We’re
tied up. We’re tied to our simulators on the other side of the
commons area. On the other side of the duck ponds over here, we have
our simulators. We’re tied to that. We have a training team.
Their sole function in life is orchestrate the problems they put into
the simulator. I refer to them as the bad guys. Of course, I would
go up there, and I’m the first one to say, “We’re
only as good as we’re trained,” which is true. They do
a wonderful job of getting us prepared for these kind of flights,
but we spend a lot of time in here.
In fact, today, you’ll see in the room we’re going to
go to downstairs, they are doing a simulation today which is called
a long rendezvous. There’s two teams. There’s a Shuttle
team today and a Station team today that are doing a simulation, an
eight-hour simulation, where they’re going to rendezvous, dock
with the Space Station, and then do some operations after that. Flight
controllers have means by which they can train individually back in
their offices on single systems trainers. They can [take] computer
base training. They’ve got workbooks. We’ve got classes.
It’s a pretty good training program that they go [through] that
was devised back when Chris Kraft invented flight control, back in
the late fifties. It’s just something we’ve built on from
year to year to get people to where they can come in here and be comfortable
being in here. The most uncomfortable I’ve ever felt in a control
room, generally speaking, was always during a simulation and very
seldom during a mission. I’ve had a couple of times I’ve
felt uncomfortable. One of those was a practical joke being played
on me, by the way, and we won’t go into that right now. But
generally, getting ready is the hardest part. Rebecca [Wright], was
there anything else in particular you want me to talk about there?
Okay.
I sometimes come here. As you can tell, I enjoy talking about this
room. My office is on the other side of the commons area, but I get
over here to kick the tires in Mission Control at least twice a day.
I drop in on the real-time team working Station and visit with them,
but sometimes I will come up here. Quite often, I’ll just walk
through here, and sometimes I’ll just come here and sit for
a little bit, especially when I’m trying to think over some
kind of a problem or something. Space Center Houston, as you can tell,
they’re back here now, which is good. I’m glad we’ve
got the public coming back, although I’ve got to admit, it kind
of destroys it for me when I hear any voice in here at all. I want
to be here, and I don’t want to hear anybody’s voice.
It’s a great room. It’s a place I really enjoy coming.
I hope you’ve enjoyed being in this place today, too, as well.
[Heflin walks to science center.]
All
right. We’re going to quickly show you [this room]. This is
the other room I talked about, which has been modified now as what
we call the science center. The idea being people who are customers
on Space Station, on Space Shuttle, can operate out of here. It provides
them a facility to where if they wanted to bring some of their own
principal investigators on some experiment and set up a little team
here they could watch over their experiment. That was the idea. This
was the other flight control room that we used. Of course, you can
tell, except it’s flat floor. It’s interesting. We’re
going to go into, I’m going to show you, the flight control
room. Flight control room, FCR, is the acronym. We have the white
FCR, we have the red FCR and the blue FCR. The white FCR is the one
we’re going to go to next, and that’s the Shuttle flight
control room. The red FCR was upstairs. It wasn’t anything to
really show you today. It’s one we use for training, just for
training. It could be used to support missions if we needed to, but
it doesn’t have the redundancy that the other flight control
rooms have. Then we have the blue FCR, and the blue FCR is the one
that supports the Space Station operations twenty-four seven that
I’ll show you. The weather group over there, the folks who have
been here for many, many years provide our weather support. It’s
interesting.
Typically
the things we deal with for launch and entry are typically weather
related. If we have a systems problem, we either solve it pretty quick
or we’re down for the day. As those of you who have followed
the program know that weather issues are usually the biggest things
we have to worry about, so we have a really fantastic group of people
here that keep track of. They understand weather at our transatlantic
sites over in Africa and Europe, our sites here in this country. They
understand the climatology and the weather for all those places and
can help us make those decisions. [Heflin walks to the white FCR public
viewing area.] Rebecca [Wright] is still not here. There she is. All
right. Have a comfortable seat. The front row’s the worst place
to sit, so anyplace but the front row. It’s the worst seat in
the house, plus you’ll get in my way if you’re on the
front row. This is the white FCR. This is the Shuttle flight control
room. We came into this facility the mid-nineties and started operating
Shuttles out of here. We did a similar thing that was done in the
old Apollo era flight control room. Back in the Gemini Program we
actually followed along with the control of a flight out of Cape Canaveral.
To transition here, we had a team control a flight from where you
were previously in the other part of the building, and we did that
for a while. Then we eventually also did a flight following a launch
and an entry before finally moving into the facility.
The
architecture here, of course—you know where we were, that was
one-of-a-kind hardware and very expensive to maintain, and sustaining
engineering was a big problem. It was time to move up and take advantage
of Bill Gates and Windows technology. So we have a control center
here with an architecture that’s built upon local area networks,
and the operating systems that do the computing for you, reside in
the console where you’re sitting instead of some big mainframe
computer. We refer to these console positions down here as workstations.
I prefer to call them consoles. I’m a traditionalist, and that’s
what I want to call them. But they’re workstations. If you take
one of those workstations down there, I’m told that the computing
capacity in one of those stations is something like three hundred
times what we had in this entire building when we landed on the Moon
in 1969, which shouldn’t surprise you. I mean there’s
people walking around with watches today that probably had more computing
capacity than we had in the Gemini spacecraft and certainly in the
Mercury [capsule].
This
team today is doing a simulation with the Station flight control team
up in the Red FCR, which we didn’t go into, but there was a
team up there as well. This is the Shuttle team. Flight director today
is Paul [F.] Dye. He works for me. He’s one of my senior Shuttle
flight directors. The CapCom [Capsule Communicator] is Linda [M.]
Godwin, Dr. Godwin. Linda has flown four times. She’s a veteran,
in that she probably will not be flying again, just based upon where
she is in her life these days. Rebecca, do they know I play in a band?
You didn’t get into that did you? Do they know that? Linda Godwin
played saxophone in this big band I play in for many years, started
back in the early eighties. Linda was with us all through the eighties
and into the nineties somewhere playing saxophone, a very good saxophone
player. Ron [Ronald E.] McNair, who perished on Challenger, was our
lead tenor saxophone player for back in the early eighties and helped
really build the band. [We] grew from a very small band into a classically
styled eighteen-piece big-era band. Ron McNair was very key in making
that happen. So Linda’s the CapCom today.
CapCom, capsule communicator, we used to fly capsules. Whoever was
going to talk to and communicate was the capsule communicator. It’s
a call sign that we’ve kept over all these years, and the concept
is you can’t have everybody talking to the crew here at one
time. We have one person that does that. It’s usually an astronaut,
most of the time a flown astronaut, [but] not always. And since the
astronauts who haven’t flown get good training by coming over
here to be a CapCom, they learn a lot about how we work, so it’s
good training for them. Typically, what happens in this room is they
all wear headsets, and then we have communication loop that’s
called the flight director loop, the Flight loop. All the discussions
go on amongst the team on the flight loop. You’ll be discussing
some technical issue, then somebody’s got to make a decision
what we’re going to do. Flight director looks to the flight
control team members here for recommendations. If the flight director
needs to decide one way or another, then the flight director will
do that.
The
CapCom, who is part of that debate, will voice that instruction or
information up to the crew. When I operated as a flight director,
the most successful shift that I could have as a flight director is
one where in which I spoke very little. What I liked to do and when
it works very well is you hear these discussions go on among the team,
and the flight director may be facilitating some of that and maybe
not. The flight director may be just doing nothing more than hearing
one technical discipline, like EECOM talk about something, and then
Flight might break in and say, “Well, GNC [Guidance, Navigation,
and Control] what do you think about that,” meaning flight director
knows that this other technical discipline has an interest in what
the EECOM is talking about, and so the flight director can kind of
help do that. Or the GNC may not need to be prompted, and the GNC
may just offer their opinion because they know they need to offer
an opinion. And then when it’s all done, CapComs are trained
that what they say to the crew needs to be sanctioned and endorsed
by the flight director. What I like to do, and what I saw that would
work an awful lot is you hear these discussions going on, and when
it’s all over, if I’m down there working and I look at
the CapCom and I just nod, or I go like that. [Gestures] We’ve
talked for fifteen minutes about something. Then the CapCom will break
that down into maybe a minute’s worth or a few seconds’
worth of information to give to the crew. They’re trained to
do that sort of thing. Sometimes we try to be politically correct
on things we’re telling the crew to do. We get in situations
that might have some political overtones.
One of the jobs of the flight director is to be aware of these landmines
that are out there in the political arena, you know, try to. Sometimes
we’ve had to phrase something right. It’s been funny,
because I’ve been here before when we’re trying to tell
the crew something. We’ve had cases where we just know the crew
just screwed up. They just screwed up. It’s pure and simple,
because we do, too. It was simple. That’s all it is, just screwed
up, but yet kind of embarrassing. You really hate to talk about it
publicly, and the air-to-ground conversation is public domain. That’s
the way we do our business. You try to find ways to say that without
really saying that. It’s funny sometimes to watch that occur.
I can’t recall the exact words, but there’s one time I
finally just had enough. “Would you just tell them they threw
the wrong switch, and I want them to go throw that switch,”
just to get the point across. So that kind of thing goes on, believe
it or not. I’ve often said this job would be real easy if I
didn’t have to work with people. I know you asked about the
technical disciplines or whatever. I’ll just tell you a few.
The way the room is kind of set up, if you go to the very front up
there, on the left hand [side], there’s GC by the way. Johnnie
Brothers is the GC today, the ground control console at the very front
part of the room. I’ve told you what GC does. If you look to
the right, over there is the Columbia mission patch from STS-107,
[it] now hangs by the GC console on the wall over there.
All
the missions that have flown out of here are depicted by this wall
over here, and we’ve started down here as well. To the left
of the GC, to the left there, is the area that has the flight controllers
that are responsible for the dynamics of flight. You’ve got
trajectory, flight dynamics officer, rendezvous, these are folks who
worry about the amount of energy we have as a spacecraft when we’re
launching to get where we want to go or when we’re landing to
get back to where we want to get back to. There’s energy that’s
got to be managed, whether you’re using actual propulsion or
whether you’re flying through the atmosphere trying to bleed
off this energy. Those folks are the ones who worry about managing
that energy. Rendezvous, of course, is a position that will be here
in the control room as we’re rendezvousing and docking. They’re
a specialist in that activity.
Right
behind them are two consoles, the propulsion system and guidance navigation
and control. Their call signs are “Prop” and “GNC”.
Prop is responsible for all of the systems onboard that provide propulsion,
the little small attitude control jet engines, the large maneuvering
engines we have. They’re responsible for all the fuel tanks,
valves, plumbing, temperature pressure measurements associated with
that system. Sitting to the Prop’s right is the GNC, guidance
navigation and control, pretty self-explanatory. We’ve got a
lot of black boxes onboard, electronic hardware that guide, navigate,
and control the Orbiter. So that’s what that flight control
position works to. To go across the hall now there, on the [right]
side of the room—“Max” is our call sign, mechanical
flight controller, responsible for all the mechanical systems, the
mechanisms that open our payload bay doors, the landing gear, the
auxiliary power units that burn hydrazine and provide the hydraulic
power, provide our hydraulic system power, and all the other mechanical
systems on the Orbiter. Also, then sitting to the right of that, is
the EGIL [Electrical, General Instrumentation, and Lighting] position.
That is the electrical power distribution flight controller. I have
served as an EGIL in flight control. I’ve been an EGIL flight
controller. So they’re responsible for the power distribution,
the fuel cells that generate our electricity on the Orbiter, and how
that power gets distributed throughout the Orbiter.
Right
behind the EGIL is the EECOM position. I’ve also been an EECOM
on Mission Control, served in that position, and they’re responsible
for the life support and the thermal aspects of the Space Shuttle
Orbiter. Thermal being you generate heat you’ve got to get rid
of, you’ve got to maintain cooling for the crew and cabin environment,
that sort of thing. Just to the left of the EECOM position is flight
activities. They’re responsible for the flight plan, the sheet
of music that we use to fly by. We’ve never flown a flight where
we’ve taken off with a flight plan and did it exactly as written
to the end. We’ve never done that. We never will do that. We
come in here with a flight plan, and then when we change it in real
time, these people have the expertise. They put together a puzzle.
The flight activities officer is one in a mission that’s packed
with all kinds of activities. I mean they have to juggle a lot of
constraints to get everything done, and that’s their job. Across
the aisle is the ACO, assembly checkout officer. When we are assembling
Space Station with a piece of hardware we’re putting on, we
will have an assembly checkout officer sitting there, flight controller
who basically works as the interface, the grunt work interface, between
the Shuttle team and the Space Station team on the assembly operation.
To
the left is data processing system, “DPS” is their call
sign, over by the wall. They take care of those 1970s 286-computers
we have onboard the Orbiter today and all of the hardware that gets
the commands from the computers out to the end item pieces of equipment,
they worry about that. Behind that is INCO, instrumentation communication,
responsible for the systems that gather telemetry and ship it to the
ground. They’re also responsible for the air-to-ground voice
system, the television system, and that sort of thing, and they worry
about all of that. Behind INCO is where the public affairs officer
would sit, telling the public what we do during the flight. Up in
front there is a position that we’ll bring in. Sitting down
there as the PDRS [Payload Deploy and Retrieval Systems], the person
responsible for the mechanical arm on the Orbiter. They’re doing
the simulation today where they’re using the arm. So that’s
where they will sit.
Behind her is the surgeon console, so we have a flight surgeon that’s
in here during the mission to help with any kind of crew concerns.
When I was a flight director, I was a friend of the flight surgeon
because I knew where they kept their antacids and they kept their
Advil and the aspirins and that sort of thing, which I could use from
time to time. Back here, the booster console for when we’re
launching. We’ll have the person responsible for the Shuttle
main engines and the solid rocket boosters. They sit right there.
When they’re not there and we do a spacewalk, we’ll bring
the EVA [Extravehicular Activity] flight controller in to sit in that
position right there. This position down here is called Mission Ops
[Operations] Director, MOD. That’s either myself, or I have
two deputies, a deputy for Station, a deputy for Shuttle, or a senior
flight director. The MOD position in here is one that’s really
not working so much real time as the MOD position becomes the interface
between the flight director and everybody outside of this room that
wants to help us do the flight. We have a mission management team
that meets. Those of you that have been following the 107 accident
investigation have been reading about the mission management team
and the processes. MOD really serves as the interface to work with
the mission management team. An example I’ll give you is if
an experimenter onboard the Shuttle has got something that didn’t
work very well for a few days and they’ve lost time. They would
like to extend one more day in order to get their experiment done.
What we do as a team in here is we will recommend to the mission management
team, “We’ll do that. We’ve got consumables. There’s
no problem. We’ve got to support that.” But that is a
mission management team decision to be made, because that means the
Orbiter is going to get back a day later at the Cape, and that affects
processing.
So the MOD will then take that to the mission management team and
say, “Hey, this person wants to do that. We can support that.
So it’s your call, Mr. Program Manager. If you want to support
that, we’re ready.” Then the mission management team will
say yes or no, and we take that decision back into this room here.
If having a single person prevents having program managers drifting
in and out trying to get their two cents in, which they’ll do
anyway, by the way, but they get their two cents in to the flight
director. There you see are the situational displays that we have
up there. There’s the world map I talked about. It’s kind
of hard to see, but on the Asian continent over there, you see the
little red circles indicating the Russian ground sites that are active.
So as you go through one of those circles, you’re within contact
with one of the Russian ground sites. This display on the right is
an extremely useful display, because at a glance the flight controller
can look up there and get the orientation of the spacecraft relative
to the Earth or deep space, which makes a big difference, because
a flight controller who has systems on the external of the spacecraft
will see different temperatures, obviously. So as things change on
their display, temperatures and pressures, [they will notice], “Oh,
the temperature’s dropping. Look up. Well, I’m on the
dark side of the world, or I’m pointed to deep space and not
to the Earth.” So it’s a great situational awareness display.
On
the left-hand side, we’ve got one of those displays which the
very top half of the display represents the keyboard activity. When
the astronauts are telling the onboard computers of the Orbiter what
to do, we can watch those keystrokes down here. We can see what displays
they’ve called up on their on board systems. So we can see that
with the top display. The bottom part of one-third of that represents
messages that the Orbiter’s computers have sensed of a condition
or whatever and transmitted that to the ground. One last story and
then I’ll open it for questions. For those of you who have seen
Mission Control during the mission, and maybe some of you have and
maybe quite a few of you haven’t, but towards the end of a mission,
there will be a vase in here of flowers. Has anybody ever seen the
flowers here at mission? Have you seen [it]? There will be some flowers
sitting here, if you ever see inside Mission Control. After the Challenger
accident, when we returned to flight on STS-26, at the end of that
mission, and I happened to work that mission. [I] was one of the flight
directors for the return to flight. After that flight or towards the
end of the flight, we had some flowers show up here in Mission Control.
There were six roses. There were five red and one white, if I recall.
I think I got that right. I think we had five crewmen on board STS-26.
We had a card, and it was basically a card that said, “Congratulations,
return to flight. Godspeed, and we support you a hundred percent,”
something like that. It came from a family up in the Dallas-Fort Worth
area, which we found out after the flight. Through the flower shop
here we got their address and sent them some patches and pictures
and thanked them for their interest, not knowing what was about to
happen to us. After that flight, there has not been a single flight
since that time, not one, every flight we’ve flown since that
time, they send flowers to Mission Control. Think about that. We’ve
flown eighty-some, ninety-some flights, including Columbia since that
time, and they have always sent flowers to Mission Control. They’re
the only ones. It has become quite a tradition. In fact, it’s
become such a tradition that there’ve been some flights where
the flowers arrived very late, like the day of landing. In fact, we
had one time when they actually arrived after wheels stop, but we
were still in control, because this control room is in control until
the crew gets out. So basically we were still in control, and that
counts. We count that, by the way. It’s interesting because
the flight controllers in here will notice that late in the mission.
“Well, where’re the flowers?” What’s interesting
also is that this family when they started, they had a daughter, still
have one child, a daughter, and I think she was three at the time.
She’s probably about ready to get into college. Wouldn’t
it be neat someday if she ends up coming to work here? Wouldn’t
that be a real cool thing? But it’s really very special because
these flowers show up every mission from these folks up in the north
part of the state. We’ve had them down here over the years.
We’ve brought them in, and they’ve taken part in some
of the activities. Like the plaque-hanging sort of thing, it’s
become a tradition here in Mission Control. Okay, that’s my
story. I’m sticking to it. Any questions? Golly, can’t
believe there’s no questions. Go ahead.
Ross-Nazzal:
When you were in the MOCR [Mission Operations Control Room], you mentioned
that you controlled a number of missions from that room. Could you
tell us what missions and what sort of memories you have?
Heflin:
Let’s see, memories I might have. I was in either that room,
or the one downstairs, now I can’t break this up for you, but
I did serve as a flight director in that part of the building for
twenty special flights. I can’t tell you which ones those were.
Not because I don’t want to, it’s just that I probably
can’t remember all those. I was the lead flight director on
seven of those flights. The lead flight director is the one who starts
working the mission way in advance, a year, eighteen months out.
My most satisfying time in Mission Control was, by luck of the draw,
I was the lead flight director for the first time we went back to
the Hubble Space Telescope on the very first repair mission. Of course,
that, to me, has been the highlight of my career. I sat in Mission
Control and I watched. We went into that pretty lock-jawed, by the
way. We were pretty tense as a team. I’ll describe it to you.
A few weeks before, well, maybe a month or so before the flight, I
got back to my office one day, and there was a page out of the Congressional
Record laying on my desk. Nobody signed it. I didn’t know where
it came from. To this day, I still don’t know where it came
from. Basically it had a few paragraphs of the Congressional Record
by some congressman or senator that was stating that if we didn’t
do this mission right, NASA’s finished. I mean it was one of
those things I looked at and I thought, “Damn, this must be
pretty important, what we’re about to go do.”
That
was kind of the attitude that went into that flight. Before that flight,
we’d lost the Mars observer. On the way to Mars, it apparently
exploded due to some propellant kind of problem. So NASA was back.
We’re in the dumps, and we’re out of the dumps. That’s
kind of our life it seems like. For me, being in Mission Control during
that mission and watching the flight control team go from very lock-jawed
to after the first spacewalk, “Oh, we did pretty good here.”
We got out of the blocks. We were doing pretty well. To watch those
lock jaw evaporate and go to little grins and little smiles was really
very satisfying.
I’ll tell you probably the toughest moment I’ve had here
in Mission Control, and I will share it with you. I alluded to a while
ago out there, but since you kind of asked, I’ll tell you when
I really felt like throwing up. I really, really felt bad. It turned
out to be a practical joke. But on Thanksgiving, and I can’t
recall what year it was, I was in the control center here. It was
Thanksgiving eve. We were just becoming sensitive to the space debris
and the concern we might have with the Orbiter in orbit. We might
have to maneuver now and then to be sure we didn’t hit something.
We’re working [with the guys] in Colorado Springs, [Colorado],
the mountain, the folks up there who do that tracking, and trying
to understand the processes that went on and how we would deal with
this thing. It turns out that right before we were going to lose our
signal, the crew was asleep. They were asleep, and right before we
were going to have like a ten-minute loss of signal, about five minutes
before that, the flight dynamics officer reported to me on the Flight
loop, he said, “Flight FIDO [Flight Dynamics Officer], I need
to report to you that space command has notified us that rocket bodies
5642 or whatever is going to come a close approach, and it’s
going to be within--.” I mean the miss distance was damn near
right on.
And said, “Okay, FIDO, what’s the time of closest approach?”He
gave me the time, and I looked at the clock. It turns out that it
was like six or seven minutes later from what he told me.
I
thought, “What? That can’t be right.” We’re
supposed to get more notification before that, but the hook had been
sunk in me. So he told me that, and I said, “Well, shoot.”
I looked at the clock, said, “Well, the crew’s asleep.”
Six minutes, there’s no way we could even get the crew up in
enough time to even do a maneuver. We couldn’t even do this.
It’s impossible to have done. So I thought, “Well, it’s
a big sky,” and there’s this big sky theory. The big sky
theory says, “We don’t have to worry about those as much
as people think we do,” so it’s like, okay. We had tracking
errors, too, and there’s always errors in tracking. Chances
are it’s not going to be exactly that. But still, this was early
in our understanding of this kind of a problem, so I really felt bad.
There wasn’t anything I could do. We had loss of signal. About
ten minutes later we’d have acquisition signal.
I
had to take a potty break, so as I was walking out went by the flight
dynamics officer’s console. He said, “Hey, flight, I have
put the object up on the display on the right-hand side on the big
screen up there.”
I
didn’t even look at it, but what I said was, “I don’t
care what it looks like. I’m just irritated that”—I
think I said, “I’m pissed that SPADOC [Space Defense Operations
Center, Colorado Springs, Colorado] didn’t tell us,” and
I walked into the other room. Before I left, I went to the EECOM console,
and I sat down by the EECOM and I said, “Look.” I did
this just by talking to him, not over the communications circuit.
I said, “We’re going to have AOS [Acquisition of Signal]
here in a few minutes. What I want you to do is as soon as we have
AOS, I want you to look at me and do this [gestures] or talk to me.”
He will be able to see the environment of the cabin right away when
we come AOS. So I wanted to assure myself that the cabin integrity
was okay, not knowing if we were going to get hit or not, thinking
we were, but not knowing. So I briefed him on doing it. I said, “Just
don’t tell anybody. Just tell me whether, just look at me and
go like this if we’re okay.” [Gestures]
So I walk back in. When I walk back in, the flight dynamics officer,
again, tried to get me to look at display. I didn’t look at
it. I just came back up and sat down. We had AOS. Cabin was tight,
no problem at all.
Now, by this time, the representative from the Shuttle Program, Brewster
[H.] Shaw was the program manager back in those days. His representative
here overnight was a guy named Hal [Harold A.] Loden. Hal came in
and sat down on my console, right prior to AOS, and was sitting there.
In the meantime, flight dynamics finally had gotten my attention,
said, “Need to talk to you.” So I went down, and he talked
to me.
What he told me at that time was, “Well, look Milt, I’m
sorry, but if you look up there and see what’s up there—there
wasn’t any object. This was just Thanksgiving, so we put a turkey
up there on this map.” It was a turkey that they had up there.
We were going to run into a turkey on Thanksgiving eve or whatever.
It wasn’t anything else out there or whatever, so it was a joke.
Of course, when he told me this, I looked at him and his compadre
at the time and I said, “Guys, I need to talk to you after the
shift. We’re going to meet next door across the hallway there.
I need to talk to you.”
So I came back and sat down, and of course, the EECOM—the Shuttle
Program representative that was there, Hal. By now I know this is
a joke. I said, “Well, Hal, it’s no problem. It’s
no big deal or whatever, no problem.” I didn’t tell him
that this was joke. I said we had no problem, whatever.
He said, “Well, boy, Milt, I’m sure glad.” He said,
“I called Brewster.” This was like two-thirty in the morning.
So he woke up Brewster Shaw and told Brewster about this. Brewster
was really pissed that SPADOC had not given us half a warning. So
now my problem went from what I thought was a real thing I had to
worry about to I got to come in here in about three hours from now.
In fact, I was getting off shift about an hour after that. I’ve
got to come back in here before Brewster Shaw gets in here, so I can
be in his face when he comes in in the morning to tell him what happened.
Believe it or not, that’s the worst feeling I’ve ever
had in Mission Control as a flight director—during what turned
out to be a practical joke.
I’ll finish by telling you [that] ought to say a lot about the
fact that we typically plan for and do these missions very, very well,
and we have good people in here that do those sort of things, so the
flight director really should not feel alone. Flight director in here
depends upon these people that sit in here. They’re very smart
people, and it’s hard to get in any trouble with all these smart
people. I think that’s one reason why we’re so successful
when we have an opportunity to be successful.
Okay, folks, I have talked enough to you, and I appreciate your patience
and time. And do you have any questions? I’ve worn you out,
haven’t I?
Larsen: I
have a question, Milt. On the Gemini Program, when I was up in the
MOCR, I always wore a sports jacket, because it was always cold.
Heflin: It
was always cold, wasn’t it?
Larsen: Always
cold. I see these people walking around like normal people with short
sleeves. Is the temperature different, or are they just tougher than
I used to be?
Heflin: No,
it was cold back then. The temperature is different. It’s funny
that you bring that up, Bill [Larsen], because it turns out, the displays
down there in the control room—I didn’t get to talk about
them much, but there were banks of little displays of lights, indicator
lights. You’ll probably remember this, because some of the modules
had like forty or so lights and little modules that would light up
whenever you had a parameter go out of limits. This little light would
come on, the computer would come on, the little pneumonic there would
tell you what the problem was just by reading it. You could do a lamp
test of this entire module at one time. All these lights would come
on. You could put your hands up there to keep your hands warm, because
I’ve been there before, too. Yes
Yes, and it’s rather fairly informal. Yes, things have changed
over there. No smoking, of course, inside.
Larsen: Right,
no cigars at the end.
Heflin:
Yes, no cigars at the end, no smoking, or whatever. The History Channel
is doing this thing for Kranz’s book [Failure is Not an
Option: Mission Control from Mercury to Apollo 13 and Beyond].
Maybe some of you have been following that thing. They did some scenes
here in Mission Control here a few weeks ago. It’s funny. They
had to get a Gene Kranz look-alike and a Glynn [S.] Lunney look-alike.
Scott [A.] Curtis, who works in our operations division, played the
part of Gene. I think most of these shots were back of the head, side
sort of thing, but he’s got a crew cut and he looked the part
a little bit.
One of my Station flight directors is Bryan [C.] Lunney. Bryan Lunney
is Glynn Lunney’s son. Glynn Lunney was the flight director,
and he was an Apollo 13 flight director. So we talked Bryan into playing
the part of his dad, which was really cool. It was really kind of
funny, because Bryan tried to grow sideburns in time for this thing.
[Laughter] What was interesting was that, I don’t know, Bryan’s
probably early forties, I guess, got a little bit of gray, but not
much. Just so happens that where he really is gray is right about
here. [Gestures] That’s where he grew his sideburns, so he had
this brown stuff right here, then you couldn’t see anything
except gray right here, which I think they had to color whenever they
did the movie.
Any other questions or comments?
Kelly: You
mentioned that they’re doing a simulation of a Shuttle rendezvousing
with the Station. Are there astronauts somewhere?
Heflin: Yes,
they’re over in the Building 5 complex with our simulators.
I’m not sure who’s there today, but they’re there.
So we’ve got two flight control teams. We’ve got the crew
over there. We’ve got a simulation team. The simulation team
we’ve got here in this building. We have the simulation supervisor,
who basically is the orchestra leader of the simulation. You’ve
got the people who run the simulators, and they’re the ones
who actually enter the problems into the simulator.
Why don’t we walk. We’ll take a peak at least from here
into the Space Station flight control room, the blue FCR. This is
where we operate twenty-four seven for Space Station. Let’s
see. You look up on the left-hand side at the clocks over there, you
see the crew’s about two hours away from going to sleep. They
typically wake up around morning time Moscow [Russia] time in Moscow.
The positions in here, so we don’t burn them out—on weekends,
we will take six of these technical disciplines in here, and we go
down to what we call the Gemini concept. We have Gemini flight controllers.
So we’ve taken six disciplines, and we break them down into
two disciplines, Gemini. Like over here on the right-hand side, you’ve
got ECLSS [Environmental Control and Life Support System]. Up front
you’ve got THOR [Thermal Operations and Resources], which is
thermal. PHALCON [Power, Heating, Articulation, Lighting, and Control],
which happens to be the EGIL equivalent, that’s the power distribution.
THOR up front is the thermal. Behind THOR is ECLSS, environmental
control. We’ve taken those three positions, and then on the
weekends, we have one super flight controller, who is responsible
for all three of those systems. There’s limited things they
can do.
That call sign, by the way, on the weekend, that becomes “Atlas.”
In fact, you see the THOR sign up there next to it is Atlas. So the
Atlas flight controller on the weekend might be a THOR. So they’re
real proficient in thermal stuff, and they know just what they need
to know about ECLSS and the power distribution to be able to do that.
Then we take the positions over here on this side, and up front you’ve
got ADCO [Attitude Determination and Control Officer], which is like
the guidance navigation and control over in Shuttle. You’ve
got OSO [Operations Support Officer], which is like the mechanical
person in the middle there. Then you’ve got ODIN [Onboard, Data,
Interfaces and Networks], which is like our DPS or data processing.
They become another technical discipline. So that [group] becomes
Titan. Those three positions become a single flight controller on
weekends called Titan. So you have Atlas and Titan, and, of course,
Atlas and Titan were things that were involved back in the Gemini
Program. So we’ve carried some of the heritage over for that.
The CapCom that’s in here, and it’s hard to see. CapCom’s
actually right straight down below here. The flight director is Rick
[Richard E.] La Brode, right down below here, and I can’t see
the CapCom enough to know really who that is. I can’t tell who
it is. CapComs aren’t here around the clock like they are when
we fly Shuttles. They’re just here during the crew wake period.
It can be informal. I mean the flight director gets on the space-to-ground.
It’s called space-to-ground on Space Station. It’s called
air-to-ground on Shuttle. The flight director can get on and talk
to the crew.
We also are much less formal here whenever we have a technical problem.
We’ll bring in the experts and sit down at the CapCom console,
and they’ll get in a roundtable. They’ll get two or three
people sitting there all talking to the crew about a problem. We don’t
go through a translator. We don’t go through the CapCom in some
cases when we’re really trying to work some sort of problem.
One position I want to point out here, which is really unique. It’s
a CIO, right here just up from us. We discovered that there were some
cats and dogs on Station that were really giving us fits, that we
really hadn’t paid a lot of attention to. Such things as where
is everything? I mean inventory. Also, how do you deal with this local
area network, all these laptops, and so forth? So we basically took
some of these really sticky things that get in your way, creature
comfort kind of things, and put them into a position. They’ve
kind of become a catchall. C doesn’t stand for catchall, by
the way. Cargo Integration Officer is what it stands for. We put somebody
down there who can help us deal with our inventory management system,
logistics, and then, of course, the local area network and the laptops.
We’ve had technical problems on Space Station. I will tell you
that the men and women that are sitting here are as good as what was
here thirty years ago doing the same job. These are people very devoted,
very smart. They can solve problems, and I’ve seen them do it.
We have not had anything life-threatening on Station, but we’ve
had at least one loss of attitude control on Station where we basically
were tumbling, but the tumble was very small, because of computer
problems. These people, they solved that problem. They got down to
it. This is a hard environment to work, by the way, when you’re
working with international partners. The Russians in particular are
extremely difficult.
I’ll give you an example of some things we worry about. Today
when I came in, my day typically starts by I read the handovers from
the previous shifts, see what’s going on, and today I read the
handovers, and I thought I almost had to laugh. I thought, “Boy,
this is another box of chocolates day.” I mean it really is
going to be. At eight o’clock in the morning, we have a Mission
Operations Directorate-wide tag-up telecon [teleconference]. I report
on the Station activities.
Today I started off by saying something to effect that, “In
the never-ending venture of spaceflight and the exploration of space,
I need to report to you today that we’re worrying about harnesses
for the treadmill that keep the crew in place when they run on treadmill,
and, believe it or not, we’re trying to find another can opener
that we can put on this logistics module we’re going to launch
Sunday up to the Space Station.” I’m not kidding you,
today—today’s activities have been associated with two
harness assemblies that we got to Russia. By this weekend, we discovered
this problem and actually got them over to Russia, and we’re
trying to get them to Baikonur [Kazakhstan] where the launch will
be for the progress.
The crew called down, and they broke the can opener. Well, we only
have one can opener. Of course, they’ve got the old survival
kind of things they could use where you put on a can. I’m not
kidding you, today is the day for this team has been trying to convince
the Russian management to hold up closing the hatch on this logistics
module just long enough so we can put two harnesses and a frigging
can opener or two on board the thing. Sometimes it’s not as
glamorous as you might think it would be. That is what Station operations
is about. Station operations is about living in space and worrying
about things like as where is my stuff and why doesn’t that
laptop work.
You look down there, and you’ll see food that’s, who knows
[how old]. Sometimes you have to look at the food very closely before
you dig into it and make sure there isn’t anything growing out
of it. It’s interesting. Dawned on me after we were here for
a while, that we did this wrong from a layout standpoint. For a twenty-four
seven operation, we probably needed to do something more in a circle
with conference tables in between, make it a more intimate friendlier
environment, instead of having everybody looking at everybody’s
back of everybody’s head. But that’s our culture. That’s
what we’ve done.
I envision one of these days that we might end up doing something
different, if we ever get the money to make those changes. Time-wise
here, it looks like they’re probably close to handover, so there’s
a few more people in here, probably some folks coming off. ECLSS console
looks like the oncoming and off-going flight controller. They’re
doing a handover now.
Any questions about Space Station? It’s the hardest thing we’ve
ever done. I can tell you right now, going to the Moon was easier.
I was here. I wasn’t in the control room, but I know going to
the Moon was easier than what we’re doing today in this business,
and I think it’s easier because back in those days Congress
knew nothing about this. Today they think they do. You’re recording
this, too, aren’t you? [Laughter]
And, of course, there was the goal to get to the Moon before the Russians,
so there was a big national, “We’ve got to beat the Russians
to the Moon” sort of thing. But in this politically latent environment
that we’re in today and with the international partner connection,
it’s a very, very difficult thing to do. As you all know, we
still call this Space Station Alpha because we couldn’t agree,
and with all the international partners, we couldn’t agree on
a name for this thing. So it’s Space Station Alpha.
I’m not kidding you. This has become, this is becoming, a zero-gravity
United Nations. I will tell you, it works better than the United Nations
we’ve got today that’s in a one-G environment, but that’s
what it’s becoming.
Okay. I’m going to quit talking again, the third or fourth time
or whatever.
Wright: Tell
us your call sign.
Heflin: I
go by “Sirius.” We ran out of colors. We got fifty-six
flight directors. The roll of flight directors today numbers fifty-six
from Chris Kraft, who was the first flight director. He was Red Flight.
Gene Kranz is White Flight. Then we used colors for a while when I
was in the flight directors class of ’83, and there weren’t
many colors we’d want. There wasn’t anything left to pick
from, we didn’t think. We decided we’d pick celestial
bodies, so we’ve got constellations. I picked Sirius, because
it’s the Dog Star, also the brightest star in our heaven. That’s
why I picked Sirius.
It’s interesting. The class of 2000, we hired ten flight directors,
and one of them is Annette [P.] Hasbrook. Just so happens that Annette
has a favorite color, and she chose to go by that for her call sign.
Fuchsia. I’m serious, so Annette is Fuchsia Flight. So we were
reminded there’s still other colors out there. Of course, I
call it pink. She wears fuchsia, and she loves it. You see her in
fuchsia almost all the time, especially over here. She’s almost
like the female Gene Kranz. I men Gene Kranz wore the vest made by
his wife, Marta, but Annette wears fuchsia colors all the time.
Okay. I’ll stop again. Y’all ready to leave?
Wright: Anybody
have anything else?
Heflin: Hey,
I’ve enjoyed the time with you. I’m really glad I got
this opportunity again. I thank y’all for what you do, because
this is very important to capture this, and we’re really glad
that you’re doing that. I hope you enjoy your time here and
hope you have fun doing it and please keep it up, because it’s
very important to us.
Wright: Thank
you again. We enjoyed it.
[End
of interview]